Skip to main content
← Back to Landscape

Classification Methodology

How 88 EU-funded cybersecurity projects are grouped into 9 thematic clusters for the COcyber Collateral Projects landscape.

1. Overview

The 88 projects in the COcyber Collateral Projects portfolio are classified into 9 thematic clusters. This classification is internal to the COcyber project and does not directly correspond to the official EU Work Programme taxonomy, which uses distinct terminologies for Horizon Europe (“Destinations”) and Digital Europe (“Specific Objectives” / “Action Areas”).

The 9 clusters represent an operational grouping designed for the COcyber cybersecurity landscape, cutting across both funding programmes.

2. Classification approach

Phase 1 — Deterministic rules (topic-code based)

Each project’s topic field contains the EU call identifier under which it was funded. Classification follows a priority-ordered set of keyword-matching rules — the first match wins:

PriorityPattern in topic (case-insensitive)Assigned cluster
1contains SOCSOC
2contains CYBER-RECyber Ranges
3contains SKILLS or TRAININGSkills & Training
4contains DEPLOYDeployment
5contains CS-01 (Horizon CL3 Cybersecurity)Cybersecurity Research
6contains INFRAInfrastructure Protection
7contains SSRI or FCT or BM-01Security & Society
8contains DIGITAL, DATA, or EDIHDigital & Data
9no matchOther

This system is deterministic and reproducible: given the same topic code, the cluster assignment is always the same. It works well for clusters that correspond directly to dedicated EU calls (e.g. CL3-CS → Cybersecurity Research, CYBER-03-SOC → SOC).

Phase 2 — Manual corrections (content-based)

Eight projects were reclassified manually because the call topic did not reflect the project’s actual content:

ProjectFrom (automatic)To (corrected)Rationale
NITRODigital & DataCyber RangesTopic CYBER-B-03-CYBER-; title “Connected 5G-IoT Cyber Range”
OT_EarWarnSysDigital & DataInfrastructure ProtectionTitle “Early Warning System for Critical Infrastructure”
AI4CYBERDigital & DataCybersecurity ResearchTitle “Trustworthy AI for Cybersecurity”
CSC-EDICDigital & DataSkills & TrainingTitle “Cybersecurity Skills Academy”
AIASOtherCybersecurity ResearchTitle “AI-Assisted Cybersecurity” (MSCA grant)
INSIDEROtherInfrastructure ProtectionTitle “Insider Threat Management for Critical Infrastructure”
SECURE-NETOtherCybersecurity ResearchTitle “Cybersecurity Ecosystem Development” (WIDERA)
Cynergy4MIEOtherInfrastructure ProtectionTitle “Leverage synergy by cyber-physical systems” (KDT-JU)
Known limitation: The topic code identifies the funding mechanism, not the project’s content. This creates issues when a project funded under a generic call (MSCA, WIDERA, KDT) conducts specific cybersecurity research, or when a topic code contains ambiguous keywords.

3. Current distribution

ClusterProjectsTotal budget
Cybersecurity Research26€132.2M
Deployment16€77.9M
SOC12€28.8M
Skills & Training7€19.4M
Infrastructure Protection7€37.9M
Cyber Ranges6€8.5M
Security & Society6€16.8M
Digital & Data4€7.4M
Other4€12.4M
Total88€341.3M

4. Relationship with official EU Work Programmes

Our clusters do not directly correspond to the official EU taxonomies. Here is how they relate:

4.1 Horizon Europe — Cluster 3: Civil Security for Society

The CL3 Work Programme 2025 (and 2026–2027) defines 6 Destinations:

HE CL3 DestinationTopic prefixOur cluster(s)Notes
Better protect the EU against Crime and TerrorismFCTSecurity & SocietyPartial — we group FCT with SSRI and BM
Effective management of EU external bordersBMSecurity & SocietyOnly BORDERLINK in our dataset
Resilient InfrastructureINFRAInfrastructure ProtectionDirect match
Increased CybersecurityCSCybersecurity ResearchNear-direct match (we also include manually reclassified projects)
Disaster-Resilient Society for EuropeDRSNo projects in our dataset
Strengthened Security Research and InnovationSSRISecurity & SocietySSRI is cross-cutting in the official WP; we merge it with FCT and BM

4.2 Horizon Europe — Cluster 4 and other programmes

Several projects come from Cluster 4 (Digital, Industry and Space) and other Horizon Europe instruments:

ProgrammeTopic patternProjectsOur cluster
HE Cluster 4CL4-DIGITAL-EMERGINGAI4CYBERCybersecurity Research
HE Cluster 4CL4-DATANexusForum.EU, CEI-SphereDigital & Data
HE Cluster 4CL4-HUMANINSTAR, StandICT.eu 2029Other
MSCAMSCA-*AIAS, INSIDERCybersecurity Research, Infrastructure Protection
WIDERAWIDERA-*SECURE-NETCybersecurity Research
SESARSESAR-*ATM-EXCITEOther
KDT-JUKDT-JU-*Cynergy4MIEInfrastructure Protection
SNS-JUSNS-*SNS CO-OPOther

4.3 Digital Europe Programme — ECCC Work Programme 2025–2027

The ECCC Cybersecurity Work Programme (€390M) defines 4 Action Areas:

ECCC Action AreaBudgetOur cluster(s)
1. New Technologies, AI & Post-Quantum Transition€142MCybersecurity Research, Deployment
2. Cyber Solidarity Act Implementation (Cyber Hubs, ECAS)€121MSOC, Deployment
3. EU Cyber Resilience Enhancement (NIS2, CRA, DORA)€118MDeployment, Infrastructure Protection
4. Programme Support Actions€9M

The specific Digital Europe topic patterns map more directly:

DEP topic patternOur clusterECCC Action Area
CYBER-03-SOCSOC#2 Cyber Solidarity
CYBER-03-CYBER-RECyber Ranges#1 New Technologies
DEPLOY-CYBER-04-*Deployment#3 Cyber Resilience
DEPLOY-CYBER-06-*Deployment#3 Cyber Resilience
DEPLOY-CYBER-07-SOC*SOC#2 Cyber Solidarity
DEPLOY-CYBER-07-CYBERS*Deployment#3 Cyber Resilience
SKILLS-* / TRAINING-*Skills & TrainingSO4 — Skills
EDIH-* / BESTUSE-*Digital & DataSO2 — Digital Capacities

5. Why “Cluster” and not “Destination”

The term “Destination” is specific to Horizon Europe and refers to the 6 thematic areas in the CL3 Work Programme. Our groupings are not Destinations for three reasons:

  • Cross-programme scope: our clusters combine projects from Horizon Europe (CL3, CL4, MSCA, WIDERA, JU) and Digital Europe (ECCC, EDIH, Skills), which each use different taxonomies.
  • Not a one-to-one mapping: even where partial overlap exists (our “Cybersecurity Research” ≈ Destination “Increased Cybersecurity”), the perimeters do not coincide exactly.
  • Different orientation: HE Destinations are organised by policy impact; our clusters are organised by operational type in the COcyber context.

The term “Cluster” (or “Thematic Area”) is more neutral and avoids confusion with official nomenclature.

6. Data quality notes

Three project acronyms appear twice in the dataset, representing distinct grants:

AcronymFirst occurrenceSecond occurrenceNote
SOCCERSOC, scored 100%, €1.63MSOC, scored 86%, €5.08MTwo distinct projects under the same SOC call
ATHENASOC (Digital Europe), scored 94%, €2.36MCybersecurity Research (Horizon Europe), unscored, €5.2MDifferent projects: cross-border SOC vs. HW/SW validation